Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 423 P3D 325 - Schmalz v. Schmalz

Schmalz v. Schmalz’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Broadhead v. Broadhead · Kelli Sue Williams v. Charles Leslie Williams · Hoffman v. Hoffman · Garrison v. CC Builders, Inc. · Kevin R. Carbaugh v. Nancy B. Nichols, f/k/a Nancy B. Carbaugh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Doctors' Company v. Insurance Corporation of America , 837 P.2d 685 , 686 (1992), we established the following procedure: [D]uring the pendency of an appeal the district court may consider a Rule 60(b) motion and if it indicates that it is inclined to grant it, application then can be made to the appellate court for a remand. ... The logical consequence is that the district court may deny the motion although it cannot, until there has been a remand, grant it .... This allows a new appeal from the denial of the motion and often the appellate court can consider that appeal together with the appeal from the original judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.