State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Liteky et al United States · Roe, Warden v. Flores-Ortega · State v. Ortiz · Williams v. Pennsylvania · 6 Kan. App. 2d 688 - State v. Puckett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“once again for the express purpose of determining whether Smith's testimony is credible, i.e., whether he told his attorney to appeal, whether the attorney did not file an appeal, and whether Smith would have appealed if his attorney had not failed to perform.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith“to consider only evidence in the record that is relevant to Smith's credibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith“to produce records of Smith's 'tattoos and brands.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.