Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 423 P3D 818 - In re Cottingham

In re Cottingham’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · Gentile v. State Bar of Nev. · Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co. · 115 Wash. 2d 747 - Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Curran · 89 Wash. 2d 613 - State v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he attorney facing discipline bears the burden of bringing to the court's attention cases that demonstrate the disproportionality of the sanction imposed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “unless it is apparent without further research that the assignments of error presented are well taken.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “prejudicial to the administration of justice”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.