Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 423 SO2D 1073 - State v. Ludwig

State v. Ludwig’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

102
cited by 102 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

102 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 102 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith (1983), 436 So. 2d 475 - State v. Kahey (1983)

102 state decisions

5701982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Mapp v. Ohio · Chambers v. Mississippi · Mincey v. Arizona · Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “of solid or weighty character, of consequence, or importance”
    22 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Relevant evidence is that tending to show the commission of the offense and the intent, or tending to negative the commission of the offense and the intent. Facts necessary to be known to explain a relevant fact, or which support an inference raised by such fact, are admissible.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, or waste of time.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.