Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 423 SO2D 1092 - State v. Chaney

State v. Chaney’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

159
cited by 159 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

159 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 159 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith (1983), 446 So. 2d 729 - State v. Prudholm (1984)

159 state decisions

8101982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Brinegar v. United States · Manson v. Brathwaite · Chambers v. Maroney · Brown v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 159 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the car is movable, the occupants are alerted, and the car's contents may never be found again if a warrant must be obtained.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Relevant evidence is that tending to show the commission of the offense and the intent, or tending to negative the commission of the offense and the intent. Facts necessary to be known to explain a relevant fact, or which support an inference raised by such fact, are admissible."”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]n order to prove the defendant is a habitual offender, the State need only establish by competent evidence that there is a prior felony conviction and that the defendant is the same person who was convicted of the prior felony.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.