423 So. 2d 1116 - State v. Ray’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
121 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 121 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith (1983), 443 So. 2d 522 - State v. Sweeney (1983)
121 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Sepulvado · State v. Duncan · D'Antignac v. United States · 391 So. 2d 421 - State v. Gibson · 369 So. 2d 118 - State v. Cox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 121 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"... must review the record for a determination of whether any prejudice which may have resulted from the non-compliance caused the trier of fact to reach to wrong conclusion." 423 So.2d 1116 , 1119”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith · State v. Martin“While the trial judge need not articulate every aggravating and mitigating circumstance outlined in art. 894.1, the record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stokes · State v. Miller“At the sentencing hearing, the defendant had expressed a desire to show circumstances which mitigated against imposition of the maximum sentence. The trial judge refused to allow him to do so. We consider such a refusal to be an abrogation of the defendant’s right to rebut misinformation relied upon in' imposing sentence or to show mitigating factors. Since we vacate the sentence and remand the case to the trial court for re-senteneing, the defendant should be afforded the opportunity to make such a showing at that time.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.