Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 423 SO2D 1130 - State v. Watson

State v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
June 1998
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gregg v. Georgia · United States v. Ventresca · Roberts v. Louisiana · 404 So. 2d 466 - State v. Lindsey · 397 So. 2d 1258 - State v. Monroe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[y]ou are required to consider the existence of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in deciding which sentence should be imposed”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"You are required to consider the existence of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in deciding which sentence should be imposed. * * * * * * "Before you decide that a sentence of death should be imposed, you must unanimously find beyond a reasonable doubt that the alleged aggravating circumstance existed. "If you find beyond a reasonable doubt the alleged aggravated circumstance existed, you may consider imposing a sentence of death. If however you do not unanimously find beyond a reasonable doubt that the alleged statutory aggravating circumstance existed, then life imprisonment without benefit of probation, parole or suspension of sentence is the only sentence that may be imposed. " Even if you find the existence of the aggravating circumstance, you must also consider any mitigating circumstances before you decide that a sentence of death should be imposed. " (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “* * * * * * If after giving consideration to all of the facts and the circumstances of the sentencing hearing in this case, and your minds are wavering, unsettled, and unsatisfied, then this is a doubt of which the law speaks and which you must resolve in favor of the defendant and return a sentence of life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence; but, if that doubt does not exist in your minds as to whether or not the State has established aggravating circumstances or circumstances, then you are obliged to return a sentencing recommendation of death. (emphasis added). * * * * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.