Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 423 SO2D 129 - Jackson v. State

Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 708 So. 2d 18 - Underwood v. State (1998), Goff v. State (2009)

48 state decisions

1801982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on King v. State · Lamar v. State · Anderson v. State · Byrd v. State · SUN-RISE RICE FARMS v. Hawkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The denial of a continuance in the trial court is not reviewable unless the party whose motion for continuance was denied makes a motion for a new trial on this ground, making the necessary proof to substantiate the motion.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]t is not necessary to make a motion for a new trial grounded upon errors shown in the official transcript of the record....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “there are certain errors that must be brought to the attention of the trial judge in a motion for a new trial”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.