Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 423 SO2D 133 - Barber v. Turney

Barber v. Turney’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 1988
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 318 So. 2d 862 - Keys v. Carter · 318 So. 2d 865 - Holmes v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is very probable that there is no uniformity of appraisals or methods in arriving at fair market value and fair market rental value of sixteenth section lands in this state ... different counties use different approaches for determining the fair rental value.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he Board has the final authority, duty and responsibility to determine the reasonable annual rental amount to be assessed on sixteenth section lands, and it is not bound by a percentage of fair market sale value or fair market rental value of the land. [Footnote omitted]. The Board is simply required to lease the sixteenth section land for the fair rental value thereof. [Emphasis added].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.