Broudy v. Broudy’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 1989
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 412 So. 2d 461 - Swartz v. Swartz · Wilkerson v. State · Cummings v. Cummings · 40 So. 2d 209 - Harmon v. Harmon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is also well-settled law ... that a master's report is clothed with a presumption of correctness and should be approved and adopted by the trial court unless clearly erroneous or unless it appears that the master has misconceived the legal effect of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the general rule, operating as it does within courts of equity, must be flexible enough to permit consideration of other relevant factors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]e will not permit the wife to take a position inconsistent with that assumed by her in her cross-petition for modification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.