Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 423 SW2D 245 - Faulkner v. Commonwealth

Faulkner v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2005

6 state decisions

3019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Berger v. United States · Edwards v. Commonwealth · Parsley v. Commonwealth · Hemphill v. Commonwealth · Banks v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[ujpon reading the record of the trial of this case the conclusion is inescapable that the Commonwealth’s attorney pursued a course of action deliberately calculated to cause the jury’s decision to be influenced by improper factors. In this he overstepped the bounds of propriety and fairness which should characterize the conduct of a prosecuting attorney.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.