Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 A2D 1089 - Watson v. Scheve

Watson v. Scheve’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2003
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2003

7 state decisions

40198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Texas v. Louisiana · Sherwood Bros. v. District of Columbia · Dougery v. Bettencourt · Wood v. Tawes · W. C. & A. N. Miller Development Co. v. Emig Properties Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Not less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the two year redemption period, the record owner shall be notified, by certified or registered mail, of the final date by which he must redeem his property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.