Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 A2D 694 - State v. Furrow

State v. Furrow’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2026

10 state decisions

7019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Kirby v. Illinois · Dusky v. United States · Pate v. Robinson · State v. Cefalo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “capable of understanding the nature and object of the charges and proceedings against him, of comprehending his own condition in reference thereto, and of conducting in cooperation with his counsel his defense in a rational and reasonable manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.