In Re Nelson’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 329 · 11 U.S.C. § 330 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Lamie v. United States Trustee · In the Matter Of: Peter Francis Geraci · Bethea v. Robert J. Adams & Associates · Krystal Cadillac-Oldsmobile-GMC Truck, Inc. v. General Motors Corp. · Wagh v. Metris Direct, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trustee also alleged in his motion that Mr. Liou’s fee application was not supported by an itemization of services as required by Local Bankruptcy Rule 5082-2. Although this allegation was undeniably true, in his written response to the motion, Mr. Liou denied it, saying, “Denied. Debtor’s counsel has attached an itemization for legal services performed to this Response (see attached itemization).” Neither law nor logic allows someone to deny making an error any time they are willing to correct it. This denial also supports sanctions against Mr. Liou.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Liou“). . 11 U.S.C. § 101 ff. Any reference to “section” or”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Liou“the integrity of the bankruptcy process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Brent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.