Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

424 F.2d 1367

Docket No. 14213.

Safely v. T.I.M.E. Freight, Inc.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1970-06-01

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1997

3 district · 1 state decisions

4 counsel of record

Relies on Krisel v. Duran · Krisel v. Duran

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1970-06-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Flournoy L. Largent, Jr., Winchester, Va. (Largent, Anderson & Larrick, Winchester, Va., on the brief), for appellants.

Robert C. Moss, and John T. Grigsby, Richmond, Va. (McCaul, Grigsby & Pearsall, Richmond, Va., on the brief), for appellee T.I.M.E. Freight, Inc.

Donald M. Murtha, Washington, D.C., on the brief for appellee International Brotherhood of Teamsters and Local Union No. 539.

David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., and Florian Bartosic, Washington, D.C., on the brief for appellee International Brotherhood of Teamsters.

Before WINTER, CRAVEN and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

On consideration of the record and briefs in this appeal we have determined that oral argument is unnecessary. We find no reversible error in the judgment of the district court and accordingly affirm.

¶2

Affirmed.

/424/f2d/1367 · .json · Public domain