Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

424 F.2d 278

Docket No. 28649

Walker v. United States

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 1970.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1970-04-08

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2250 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Murphy v. Houma Well Service · Huth v. Southern Pacific Co. · Ketcherside v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1970-04-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Bonner v. Henderson (1975), Skinner v. United States (1970)

27 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

250197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Summary Calendar.

¶2Jack Aaron Walker, pro se.

¶3John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., J. Owen Forrester, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

¶4Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM:

¶6Appellant Walker, a federal prisoner, filed his motion in the District Court requesting a copy of his indictment and transcripts of his arraignment and sentencing. He has no appeal pending, nor has he filed or attempted to file a motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, or a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court. The District Court denied the motion. We affirm.1

¶7Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2250 provides that only where a petitioner for the writ of habeas corpus has been granted leave *279to proceed in forma pauperis and his application is pending before the court is that petitioner entitled to be furnished copies of court records without cost. Harless v. United States, 5 Cir. 1964, 329 F.2d 397. A federal prisoner is not entitled to obtain copies of court records at Government expense for the purpose of searching the record for possible error. Harless v. United States, supra;Culbert v. United States, 10 Cir. 1964, 325 F.2d 920; Ketcherside v. United States, 6 Cir. 1963, 317 F.2d 807.

¶8The judgment below is

¶9Affirmed.

/424/f2d/278 · .json · Public domain