Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 F.2d 296 - In re Carnell Construction Corp.

In re Carnell Construction Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

424 F.2d 296 · 1970

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Copeland Pension Benefit Fund Inc, Eckles v. Petco Inc., Interstate (In Re Balducci Oil Co.) (1983)

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

16019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katchen v. Landy · Katchen v. Landy · Alexander v. Hillman · H. J. Lewis Oyster Co. v. United States · In re Solar Manufacturing Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is settled that a creditor who proves a claim submits himself to the summary jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court in respect of preferences or voidable transfers, including the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court to enter a monetary judgment or order a return. It also appears to be fairly well settled that a creditor who files his claim in the Bankruptcy Court impliedly consents to be sued on counterclaims arising out of the same transaction, but that such a filing does not constitute implied consent to be sued on an alleged cause of action arising out of a different subject matter.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.