Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 F.2d 369 - Pineda v. Craven

Pineda v. Craven’s Empirical Analysis

424 F.2d 369 · 1970

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
September 1989
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Aguilar v. Texas · Townsend v. Sain · Fay v. Noia · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when the state court has not held an evidentiary hearing and has not thereafter reliably found the facts affecting the federal constitutional claim, the federal habeas court must hold its own evidentiary hearing and itself find the relevant facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “There is nothing strategic or tactical about ignorance....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.