United States v. Ebey’s Empirical Analysis
424 F.2d 376 · 1970
Citation profile
57
cited by 57 later decisions
September 1985
most recently cited
52 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Time, Inc. v. Bon Air Hotel, Inc. · Patterson v. Medberry · Crest Finance Co. v. United States · Bartchy v. United States · Venus v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We agree with the defendant on the basis of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Ward v. United States, 344 U.S. 924 , 73 S.Ct. 494 , 97 L.Ed. 711 (1953), rev’g, 195 F.2d 441 (5th Cir. 1952), and Venus v. United States, 368 U.S. 345 , 82 S.Ct. 384 , 7 L.Ed.2d 341 (1961), rev’g, 287 F.2d 304 (9th Cir. 1960). See also, Bartchy v. United States, 319 U.S. 484 , 63 S.Ct. 1206 , 87 L.Ed. 1534 (1943). Under these cases “[a] registrant is not required to remain at one place or report to the board every move that he makes. The regulation is satisfied if a ‘good’ address is furnished. Cf. Kokotan v. United States, 408 F.2d 1134 (10th Cir. 1969).” United States v. Ebey, 424 F.2d 376 , 377 (10th Cir. 1970). [ 472 F.2d at 762-763 (footnotes omitted).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Generally, the issue of criminal intent is a factual question peculiarly within the province of the jury. Van Nattan v. United States, 357 F.2d 161 (10th Cir. 1966). It is seldom provable by direct evidence but may be inferred from all the facts and circumstances of a case which reasonably tends to show a mental attitude. [Citations omitted.]” 424 F.2d at 378 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The regulation, it seems to us, is satisfied when a registrant, in good faith, provides a chain of forwarding addresses by which mail, sent to the address which is furnished the board, may be by the registrant reasonably expected to come into his hands in time for compliance.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.