Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 F.2d 378 - Irving Gordon and Margaret Gordon v. Cmmissioner of Intenal Revenue

Irving Gordon and Margaret Gordon v. Cmmissioner of Intenal Revenue’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
May 1995
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 1995 · most notably Redding v. Commissioner (1980), Berry Petroleum Co. v. Commissioner (1995)

15 federal appellate · 1 district ·

160197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Eisner v. Macomber · United States v. Equitable Life Assurance Society · Helvering v. Southwest Consolidated Corp. · Palmer v. Commissioner · Commissioner v. Gordon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although a number of cases have pointed to a complete identity of shareholders before and after the transaction as evidence that the corporation had undergone a mere change in form, see, e. g., Associated Machine v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 403 F.2d 622, 625 (9 Cir. 1968); Estate of Stauffer v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 403 F.2d 611, 618 (9 Cir. 1968); Davant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 366 F.2d 874, 884 (5 Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1022 , 87 S.Ct. 1370 , 18 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967), it is not clear thus far whether' such an identity is an indispensable condition to the invocation of Section 368(a)(1)(F).””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “* * * a divisive reorganization should not qualify as a mere change in form for purposes of Section 354 unless it meets the standards of either Section 354 (b) or Section 355. [ 424 F. 2d at 385 .]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “not essentially equivalent to a dividend”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.