United States v. Dalli’s Empirical Analysis
424 F.2d 45 · 1970
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably United States v. Arroyo-Angulo (1978), United States v. Clark (1973)
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Diaz v. United States · Bandy v. United States · Cureton v. United States · Glouser v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a defendant has a right to be present at a suppression hearing where testimony is to be taken”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is not absolute and may be relinquished by acts or statements of the defendant which constitute a voluntary waiver”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.