Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

424 F.2d 554

Docket No. 14112.

Carson v. Finch

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1970-05-07

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1973

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Laws v. Celebrezze · Bolick v. Finch

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1970-05-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

John B. Culbertson, Greenville, S.C., for appellant.

William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Joseph O. Rogers, U.S. Atty., Kathryn H. Baldwin and A. James Barnes, Attys., Department of Justice, for appellee.

Before BOREMAN, BRYAN and WINTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Upon examination of the record, briefs and appendices, we are of opinion to dispense with oral argument.

¶2

The application of appellant, Beatrice J. Carson, for social security disability benefits was denied by the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare. The district court, upon review, found that the Secretary's denial of benefits was supported by substantial evidence and granted the Secretary's motion for summary judgment.

¶3

We reach the conclusion that the court below correctly determined that the Secretary's decision is supported by substantial evidence and we, therefore, further conclude that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed. Bolick v. Finch, 423 F.2d 723 (4 Cir. 1970); Laws v. Celebrezze, 368 F.2d 640 (4 Cir. 1966).

¶4

Affirmed.

/424/f2d/554 · .json · Public domain