DeSeversky v. Brenner’s Empirical Analysis
424 F.2d 857 · 1970
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 13 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2012 · most notably Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc. (2008), Ralph M. Hackley v. Richard L. Roudebush, Administrator of Veterans Affairs (1975)
12 federal appellate · 13 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on National Broadcasting Co. v. United States · Lincoln Engineering Co of Illinois v. Stewart-Warner Corporation · United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co. · Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board · California Research Corp. v. Ladd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In an action under 35 U.S.C. § 145 , the plaintiff has a trial de novo and may introduce evidence not previously presented to the Patent Office. But he is precluded from presenting new issues, at least in the absence of some reason of justice put forward for failure to present the issue to the Patent Office.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“phase of the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Edison v. Ziegler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.