Depoutot v. Raffaelly’s Empirical Analysis
424 F.3d 112 · 2005
Citation profile
38 federal appellate · 85 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 146 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Iverson v. City of Boston (2006), Cabn Hernndez v. Philip Morris Usa Inc
38 federal appellate · 85 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Daniels v. Williams · Paul v. Davis · Fuentes v. Shevin · County of Sacramento v. Lewis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 146 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a conglomeration of 'conclusory allegations, improbable inferences, and unsupported speculation' is insufficient”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“genuine issue as to any material fact and reflects the movant's entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“so extreme and egregious as to shock the contemporary conscience.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.