Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 F. Supp. 366 - Buckner v. Maher

424 F. Supp. 366 - Buckner v. Maher’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
July 1995
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 1995 · most notably Fabula v. Buck (1979), Beltran v. Myers (1983)

10 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

210197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Weinberger v. Salfi · Hagans v. Lavine · Sosna v. Iowa · Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if such applicant has not made, within seven years prior to the date of such application for aid, an assignment or transfer or other disposition of property without reasonable consideration or for the purpose of qualifying for an award . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “may not, in administering federally sponsored welfare programs, either presume the availability of income or resources not actually available, nor add eligibility criteria not expressly authorized by Congress”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “... [I]t does not follow that a state may impose unlimited burdens of proof upon welfare applicants, especially where an applicant has cooperated fully in good faith and is not in a position to do more.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.