424 F. Supp. 451 - Sanchez v. Sanchez’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1443 · 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1994
Relies on Georgia v. Rachel · City of Greenwood v. Peacock · Ogletree v. Ohio · Maryland v. Soper · Johnson v. Mississippi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] removal petition under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1443(1) must satisfy a two-pronged test. First, it must appear that the right allegedly denied the removal petitioner arises under a federal law 'providing for specific civil rights stated in terms of racial equality.' ... Second, it must appear, in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 1443(1), that the removal petitioner is 'denied' or cannot enforce' the specified federal rights 'in the courts of [the] State.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he history of Sec. 1443(2) demonstrates convincingly that this subsection of the removal statute is available only to federal officers and to persons assisting such officers in the performance of their official duties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.