Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 FSUPP 715 - United States v. Sinclair

United States v. Sinclair’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
March 1990
most recently cited

4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 1990

4 district ·

50197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 26 U.S.C. § 7203 · 26 U.S.C. § 7212 · 28 U.S.C. § 144

Relies on United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Berger v. United States · Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United States · Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers, Inc. v. United States · J. Gordon Turnbull, Inc. v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] claim of bias or prejudice based on judicial knowledge gained from prior hearings or other cases is not sufficient grounds for disqualification of a judge whether it be from prior judicial exposure to the defendant or judicial rulings adverse to the defendant in the same or different cases.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... an attitude arising from extrajudicial sources that results “in an opinion on the merits on the basis other than what the judge learned from his participation in the case ..., or results in an “attitude toward [the] petitioner that is significantly different from and more particularized than the normal, general feelings of society at large against convicted wrongdoers.” (Citations omitted.) United States v. Sinclair, 424 F.Supp. at 718 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.