In Re Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 1992
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Perez. v. Campbell · Lines v. Frederick · Morimura, Arai & Co. v. Taback · Kentile Floors, Inc. v. Winham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . we agree with the district court that whatever reliance Kentile (the creditor) placed upon these statements was not a reasonable reliance, that Ken-tile therefore had no right to rely upon the statements in this situation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matter of Danesi“in reliance (by the creditor) upon a materially false statement in writing respecting (the debtor's) financial condition made or published ... with intent to deceive ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.