Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 MASS 409 - Commonwealth v. Carter

Commonwealth v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Commonwealth v. Colon (2007), Commonwealth v. Mubdi (2010)

31 state decisions

190199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Salvucci · Commonwealth v. Montanez · Commonwealth v. Santaliz · Commonwealth v. Amendola · Commonwealth v. Alvarado

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Article 14 [of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights] does not relieve a defendant who unlawfully intruded on someone else's reasonable expectation of privacy from establishing that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy himself”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We do not construe our Amendola opinion [ Commonwealth v. Amendola , 406 Mass. 592 , 601 (1990),] as giving a defendant the right to assert the constitutional rights of someone in no way involved with his allegedly criminal conduct”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “it would be more than inappropriate to permit a person fleeing from the police to rely on art. 14 [of the Massachusetts Constitution] to suppress evidence that he left on some third person's property”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.