Commonwealth v. Beauchamp’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 district · 25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Commonwealth v. Wilson (1998), Commonwealth v. Santiago (1997)
2 district · 25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chimel v. California · Teague v. Lane · Doyle v. Ohio · Mincey v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the prosecutor may not elicit evidence of . . . the discussions the defendant had with his attorney to argue that these were evidence that the defendant fabricated his story”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Ordinarily, a criminal defendant gets the full benefit of any changes in the law while on direct review”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.