Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 MD 503 - Matthews v. State

Matthews v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

41 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Santobello v. New York · Walczak v. State · Randall Book Corp. v. State · Chaney v. State · Maryland v. Kanaras

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Illegal sentence. The court may correct an illegal sentence at any time.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The ‘scope of this privilege ... is narrow.’ To constitute an illegal sentence under Rule 4-345(a), ‘the illegality must inhere in the sentence itself, rather than stem from trial court error during the sentencing proceeding.’ Accordingly, ‘we have denied relief pursuant to Rule 4-345(a) because the sentences imposed were not inherently illegal, despite some form of error or alleged injustice.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““(3) Approval of plea agreement. If the plea agreement is approved, the judge shall embody in the judgment the agreed sentence, disposition, or other judicial action encompassed in the agreement[.]””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.