Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 N.E.2d 1011 - Lee v. State

Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2000
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lakeside v. Oregon · Hill v. State · Gross v. State · Priest v. State · Frasier v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The evil to be avoided is the drawing of the jurors’ attention to the defendant’s failure to testify. When the defendant has made the judgment that the instruction has this undesired effect, the court is obligated to protect the defendant’s privilege against self-incimination by omitting the instruction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.