Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 N.E.2d 1021 - Page v. State

Page v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

106
cited by 106 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

106 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 106 later decisions — most recently April 2014 · most notably Anglemyer v. State (2007), Wagner v. State (1985)

106 state decisions

8801981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gardner v. State · Abercrombie v. State · Page v. State · Keys v. State · In re Edwards

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a statement of the court's reasons for selecting the sentence that it imposes.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[i]n order to carry out our function of reviewing the trial court’s exercise of discretion in sentencing, we must be told of [its] reasons for imposing the sentence .... This necessarily requires a statement of facts, in some detail, which are peculiar to the particular defendant and the crime, as opposed to general impressions or conclusions.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"Alright [sic], Mr. Smith, the Court has reflected on this Pre-Sentence Investigation and I recall the-the facts to which you testified in the-at your guilty plea and I have, as I said, gone over the facts involved in this case. The Court is struck by the indiscriminate nature of this offense and by the total disregard for the life and safety of others involved in this case, not only the victim but the victim's son, and I find that the aggravated cireumstances in this particular crime to outweigh the mitigating circumstance es. In fact, I can find nothing mitigating in this matter except your age. There is no doubt in my mind that an individual who can commit a crime of this magnitude and total disrespect for the safety of other people is in need of correctional or rehabilitative treatment that can best be provided by your commitment to a penal facility, and there is no question in my mind but that imposition of a reduced sentence or suspension of sentence and imposition of probation would depreciate the seriousness of this crime. I also recall that there was some physical damage in this case as a result of your-the commission of this crime. Therefore, I'm going to sentence you to the Indiana Department of Correction on the charge of Rape to a term of 50 years and I'm going to sentence you on the charge of Confinement to the Indiana Department of State Correction for a term of 20 years, the two charged [sic] to be served concurrently. You will be assess [sic] Court costs in t”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.