Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 P2D 35 - Hill v. Graham

Hill v. Graham’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably Nealis v. Baird (1999), Graham v. Keuchel (1993)

4 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

1001967197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Shawnee v. Cheek · Tucker v. Tucker · Hampton v. Clendinning · Forston v. Heisler · Gochenour v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A. When the death of one is caused by the wrongful act or omission of another, the personal representative of the former may maintain an action therefor against the latter, or his personal representative if he is also deceased, if the former might have maintained an action, had he lived, against the latter, or his representative, for an injury for the same act or omission. The action must be commenced within two (2) years.... ””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * Although considerations of public policy which support a rule have changed, this cannot provide grounds for creating a right of action by judicial legislation where none existed before.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “... [A]ny right of action thus granted by the statute is predicated solely upon the right of action which was personal to the deceased had he lived.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.