Parris v. McCallay’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2024
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Aderhold v. Bishop · Hollenbeck v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. · Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company v. Jones · State ex inf. Crow v. Vallins · Layton v. Purcell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under the harmless error statutes, Tit. 12 O.S.1961, §§ 78 and 636, and Tit. 22 O.S.1961, § 1608, where the judgment of the trial court is in accord with the verdict of a properly instructed jury, and is within the issues and supported by competent evidence, it will not be reversed on account of alleged errors in practice and procedure, unless they constitute substantial violation of appellant’s constitutional or statutory rights, or have prejudiced him in the jury’s determination.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““An attorney cannot sit idly by until afterward, and then make a vague, general objection that may leave both the trial court and the appellate court in doubt as to just what the objection is directed and as to the proper, or precise, ground upon which it is based.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thompson v. Inman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.