Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 P2D 87 - Scovil v. Chilcoat

Scovil v. Chilcoat’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
5
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2018

8 state decisions

20196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 23 Wash. 2d 348 - Cochran v. McDonald · Wallace v. McCampbell · Cooke v. Townley · International Harvester Co. v. Lawyer · Pemberton v. Dean

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “After a careful examination of the above-cited authorities, we conclude that warranty is a matter of intention. A decisive test is whether the vendor assumes to assert a fact of which the buyer is ignorant, or merely states an opinion, or his judgment, upon a matter of which the vendor has no special knowledge, and on which the buyer may also be expected to have an opinion and to exercise his judgment. In the former case there is a warranty; in the latter case there is not[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.