Parker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
1 district · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2013
1 district · 22 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Ruona · 94 Okla. Crim. 105 - Thrasher v. State · 94 Okla. Crim. 237 - McDaniel v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“existing or present bodily restraint, directing influence, domination or regulation, of an automobile, while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Mason v. State · Hughes v. State“[O]n at least three occasions the Ohio Legislature has acted on statutes dealing with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. As will be noted, the 1936 statute made no mention of ‘being in physical control.’ The 1941 statute added the words, ‘being in actual physical control,’ thus broadening the coverage of the statute to include persons found sitting behind the wheel of a stationary automobile, ...”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Reddie v. State · Helsper v. State““1. It is unlawful and punishable by law, for any person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor to drive, operate, or be in actual physical control of any motor vehicle within this State. 47. O.S.A. § 11-902 (a) 2. Actual physical control, as used in Title 47, supra, means: existing or present bodily restraint, directing influence, domination or regulation of any automobile, while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. 3. If a person has existing or present bodily restraining, directing influence, domination or regulation of an automobile, while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, he commits an offense within the provisions of the statute. 4. Title 47, O.S.A. § 11-902 (a) is constitutional. 5. Title 47, supra, defines two distinct offenses: one being, it is unlawful for any person under the influence of intoxicating liquor to drive or operate any motor vehicle within this State; and the other being, it is unlawful for any person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor to be in actual physical control of any motor vehicle within this State.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bearden v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.