State v. Jenny’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1992
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tsavaris v. Scruggs · State Ex Rel. Foster v. Hall · Orosz v. State · 320 So. 2d 401 - State v. Yatman · 343 So. 2d 892 - State v. Powell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Witnesses; person not excused from testifying in certain prosecutions on ground testimony might incriminate him; immunity from prosecution. No person, having been duly served with a subpoena or subpoena duces tecum, shall be excused from attending and testifying or producing any book, paper, or other document before any court having felony trial jurisdiction, grand jury, or state attorney, upon investigation, proceeding, or trial for a violation of any of the criminal statutes of this state upon the ground or for the reason that the testimony or evidence, documentary or otherwise, required of him may tend to convict him of a crime or to subject him to a penalty or forfeiture, but no person shall be prosecuted or subjected to any penalty or forfeiture for or on account of any transaction, matter or thing concerning which he may so testify or produce evidence; documentary or otherwise, and no testimony so given or produced shall be received against him upon any criminal investigation or proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jenny v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.