¶1We affirm the revocation of probation, judgment and sentence imposed herein. The record, however, establishes that the lower court failed to state with particularity its justification for retaining jurisdiction over one-third of the sentence. We remand to the lower court with directions to either relinquish the retention of jurisdiction over one-third of Miller’s sentence or to state with particularity the justification for retaining jurisdiction as required by section 947.16(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981). Hernandez v. State, 421 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Sanders v. State, 400 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Hicks v. State, 388 So.2d 357 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).
424 So. 2d 207
Miller v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 5, 1983
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1983-01-05
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2015
1 state decisions
Relies on Hicks v. State · 400 So. 2d 1015 - Sanders v. State · 421 So. 2d 1102 - Hernandez v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1983-01-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →