Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 So. 2d 596 - May v. Moore

424 So. 2d 596 - May v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'n (1983), 466 So. 2d 856 - Hall v. Hilbun (1985)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 24 state decisions

901982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 72 Wash. 2d 73 - Pederson v. Dumouchel · State v. Arthur Andersen & Co. · King v. Williams · 382 So. 2d 528 - Zills v. Brown · 412 So. 2d 254 - Drs. Lane, Bryant, Eubanks & Dulaney v. Otts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Proof may be made concerning a party purposefully and wrongfully destroying a document which he knew was supportive of the interest of his opponent, whether or not an action involving such interest was pending at the time of the destruction. See Gamble, McElroy's Alabama Evidence, § 190.05 (3d ed. 1977). Additionally, the spoliation, or attempt to suppress material evidence by a party to a suit, favorable to an adversary, is sufficient foundation for an inference of his guilt or negligence."”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) In performing professional services for a patient, a physician’s, surgeon’s or dentist’s duty to the patient shall be to exercise such reasonable care, diligence and skill as physicians, surgeons, and dentists in the same general neighborhood, and in the same general line of practice, ordinarily have and exercise in a like case. In the case of a hospital rendering services to a patient, the hospital must use that degree of care, skill and diligence used by hospitals generally in the community. (b) Neither a physician, a surgeon, a dentist nor a hospital shall be considered an insurer of the successful issue of treatment or service.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We need not distinguish between the Defendants as parties and the insurer and Ford as third persons, for they acted as one and by the same attorney throughout the entire discovery steps.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.