Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 So. 2d 605 - Thrasher v. Bartlett

424 So. 2d 605 - Thrasher v. Bartlett’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2013

17 state decisions

501982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Sam Fox Publishing Company v. United States · Sutphen Estates, Inc. v. United States · County of Fresno v. Andrus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Upon timely application, anyone shall be permitted to intervene in an action: . . . (2) when the applicant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and he is so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede his ability to protect that interest, unless the applicant's interest is adequately represented by existing parties.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]n order denying intervention as of right is appealable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"Upon timely application anyone may be permitted to intervene in an action: (1) when a statute confers a conditional right to intervene; or (2) when an applicant's claim or defense and the main action have a question of law or fact in common.... In exercising its discretion the court shall consider whether the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the rights of the original parties." (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.