424 So. 2d 631 - Walker v. Eubanks’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2017
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thompson v. City of Birmingham · Vinyard v. Republic Iron & Steel Co. · State v. Pollock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an inadvertent omission by the clerk of a judgment entered by the trial court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The trial of this cause in the circuit court was, under our statute, de nqvo. This means that, subject only to a restriction of the claim to an amount or value within the jurisdiction of the justice court; the trial is had as though the suit originated in the circuit court; and a new complaint or an amendment to the old, may be filed by the plaintiff, provided it does not exhibit an entire change of parties plaintiff or defendant, and does not show a departure from, or change in, the original form of action.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holcomb v. Morris“We have decided to allow the supplement to the record even at this point because it appears to be within the purpose of Rule 10(f)[, Ala. R.App. P.,] to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.