424 So. 2d 722 - Payne v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2014
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · 368 So. 2d 871 - Cumbo v. State · 363 So. 2d 1020 - Thomas v. State · 395 So. 2d 127 - Hayes v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[O]nce an accused asks to remain silent or requests an attorney, all questioning of that accused must cease at that point. Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). However, 'an accused . . . having expressed his desire to deal with the police only through counsel, is not subject to further interrogation by the authorities until counsel has been made available to him unless the accused himself initiates further communication, exchanges or conversations with the police.' (Emphasis added.) Edwards v. Arizona , 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981)."”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Whether there is sufficient circumstantial evidence to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis but that of guilt is a question for the jury. . . . . This court must not substitute its judgment for that of the jury. Thomas v. State , 363 So.2d 1020 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978). . . . Our duty is to 'determine if legal evidence was presented from which the jury, by fair inference could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.' Citations omitted. Thomas v. State , supra."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.