Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 So. 2d 916 - McCray v. State

424 So. 2d 916 - McCray v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1988
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite · Clay v. State · State v. DH

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we believe that by specifying the instances when a juvenile may be treated as an adult for purposes of criminal prosecution that the legislature intended to replace the common law presumption with the statutory scheme set out in Chapter 39 and under which [appellant] was prosecuted herein. Thus, we conclude that a juvenile tried as an adult under this scheme is not entitled to an instruction to the jury on the common law presumption of disability by reason of age.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.