Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 S.W.2d 32 - Gold v. Simon

Gold v. Simon’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
April 1981
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ladner v. Reliance Corp. · Texan Development Co. v. Hodges · Teague v. Edwards · Hill v. Melton · Milburn v. Minette

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the cases it appears that in a plea of privilege case a defendant who affirmatively alleges fraud on the jurisdiction (for venue purposes) raises additional issues upon which he has the burden of proof and in support of which he is entitled to introduce evidence. 59 Tex.Jur.2d, p. 585, ‘Venue’, Sec. 147, ‘(Requisites of plea) — Alleging venue fraudulently laid’; McDonald’s Texas Civil Practice 376, 459; Texan Development Co. v. Hodges, 237 S.W.2d 436 (Amarillo, Tex.Civ.App.1951, no writ history).” “ . . . Once the defendant’s pleading raises the issue of fact as to the matters above enumerated and produces evidence of probative force and effect in support thereof, a determination may be made by reference to the evidence rather than by reference to the plaintiff’s petition. . . . ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.