Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 SW2D 347 - Cooper v. Norman

Cooper v. Norman’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1994
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Oliver L. Taetz, Inc. v. Groff · Millar v. Berg · O'NEAL v. Mavrakos Candy Co. · Evett v. Corbin · Hart v. Midkiff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To what amount could he [the trial judge] have limited the recovery by instructions when no definite or determinable compensation was shown by the pleadings or the evidence? The rule placing a restrictive limitation on the recovery allowable in a quantum meruit action is applicable, of necessity, only in those instances where the action had its inception in a contract where the compensation was fixed or was susceptible of being accurately ascertained.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.