Charles v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 2003 · most notably Collins v. State (1976), Jones v. State (2003)
2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Gideon v. Wainwright · Escobedo v. Illinois · Jackson v. Denno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Q Now is that the statement that you signed ? “A Yes, sir. “Q Did the police officer read that up at the top to you before you signed it? Telling you what your rights were? “A Yes, sir. "Q And did you read that statement after it was written and before you signed it ? “A Yes, sir, I think I read it. “Q And did you freely and voluntarily give that statement to the police officers ? “A Yes. 'Q Did you sign this after you had appeared before Judge Matthews ? ‘A Yes, I think so. ‘Q And the warning that is at the top of the statement that you signed; is that the same thing Judge Matthews told you? A Yes, sir. ‘Q Did Judge Matthews tell you you had been charged with the offense of armed robbery ? ‘A Yes, sir. ‘Q Did he tell you that you had a right to hire a lawyer and have him present prior to and during any interview or questioning by peace officers or attorneys representing the State ? ‘A Yes. ‘Q Did he tell you if you were too poor to afford a lawyer that you had the right to request the appointment of a lawyer to be present prior to and during any questioning or interview? ‘A Yes. ‘Q Did he tell you that you may have a reasonable time and opportunity to consult your lawyer if you desired? ‘A Yes. ‘Q Did he tell you you had the right to remain silent? ‘A Yes. ‘Q Did he tell you that you were not required to make a statement and that any statement you made can and may be used against you in court? ‘A Yes. 'Q Did he tell you you had the right to stop any interview or questioning”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Pete v. State · Sanchez v. Beto““From the record, it appears that the reference to taking a polygraph test related to other people and not the appellant. This would not constitute reversible error under the rule announced in Peterson v. State, 157 Tex.Cr.R. 255 , 247 S.W.2d 110 , 248 S.W.2d 130 , cited by appellant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Renesto v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.