Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 424 U.S. 577 - Lavine v. Milne

Lavine v. Milne’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

324
cited by 324 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
18
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

77 federal appellate · 33 district · 79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 324 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2021 · most notably Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal. (1993), Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. Weast (2005)

77 federal appellate · 33 district · 79 state decisions — followed in 18 states

930197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Dandridge v. Williams · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Leary v. United States · Turner v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 324 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]utside the criminal law area, where special concerns attend, the locus of the burden of persuasion is normally not an issue of federal constitutional moment.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]here the burden of proof lies on a given issue is, of course, rarely without consequence and frequently may be dispositive”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(w)elfare benefits are not a fundamental right . . . .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.