Joseph v. Rowlen’s Empirical Analysis
425 F.2d 1010 · 1970
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York (1980), Gray v. Spillman (1991)
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pierson v. Ray · Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co. · Whirl v. Kern · Northern Pacific Railroad v. Urlin · David L. Joseph v. James H. Rowlen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the proper time to object to a verdict which may appear ambiguous or somehow deficient is at the time it is returned and before the jury is discharged”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Appellate courts should be slow to impute to juries a disregard of their duties, and to trial courts a want of diligence or perspicacity in appraising the jury's conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We believe any distinction between an award of 6< and '0' damages is more of form than substance”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.