Schram v. Cupp’s Empirical Analysis
425 F.2d 612 · 1970
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
June 1971
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Johnson v. Zerbst · Gideon v. Wainwright · Townsend v. Sain · Fay v. Noia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The judgment roll of the 1946 conviction reveals only that Schram expressed a desire for counsel. It is barren of any indication that Schram was given or had waived counsel. Schram testified that no one told him in 1946 that he had a right to be represented by an attorney at public expense or otherwise, and that he did not know about that right. Schram was indigent.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McGhee v. Sigler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.